Vergelijken
Felagarversus Teamwork
Teamwork covers client projects well. Felagar adds agency portal cobranding, guest reviews, and Rad on the Vault.
At a glance
If Teamwork feels like a lot of product for a studio that just wants a coherent client face, look at the portal and review loop.
| Capability | Felagar | Teamwork |
|---|---|---|
| Client portal | Branded portal, cobranding, guest review links | Solid client features in their suite. |
| AI | Rad, grounded in Client Vault and pulse (confirm before you send) | Add-ons and assistants vary; not Vault-grounded Rad. |
| Pricing model | Hosted plans plus a one-time self-host license | Usually per-seat SaaS. Check their current site. |
| Self-host | Yes, open-core with a license for full white-label | SaaS-first. |
| White-label | Portal, auth, emails, custom domains on hosted SaaS | Client-facing options exist; confirm domain and cobranding. |
When Felagar fits better
Choose Felagar when white-label, cobranding, and a smaller agency-shaped OS matter more than a wide PM catalog.
When they may fit
Choose Teamwork if you already live in that suite and need its wider PM and helpdesk footprint.
Questions
Can we move from Teamwork to Felagar?
Yes as a workspace change. Expect to rebuild projects and clients, not a one-click clone of every Teamwork feature.
Wij draaien het platform. Jij de studio.
Maak een account, nodig team en klanten uit, en je bent live, geen DevOps-sidequest. Updates, uptime en het portaal blijven bij ons zodat jij bij het werk blijft dat loont.