Vergelijken
Felagarversus Basecamp
Basecamp keeps work simple. Felagar keeps client delivery, reviews, and the account together when you run an agency.
At a glance
If Basecamp still feels like an internal camp and the client gets a guest login plus email, you do not have an agency face. You have a project.
| Capability | Felagar | Basecamp |
|---|---|---|
| Client portal | Branded portal, cobranding, guest review links | Clients can be invited into a project. It is not a cobranded agency portal. |
| AI | Rad, grounded in Client Vault and pulse (confirm before you send) | Not a Client Vault-grounded assistant. |
| Pricing model | Hosted plans plus a one-time self-host license | SaaS, typically per company or space. Check their current site. |
| Self-host | Yes, open-core with a license for full white-label | SaaS-first. |
| White-label | Portal, auth, emails, custom domains on hosted SaaS | Basecamp branding. Not an agency white-label product. |
When Felagar fits better
Choose Felagar when you need a white-label portal, guest deliverable reviews, CRM, time, and retainers on the same companies.
When they may fit
Choose Basecamp if you want a small, opinionated PM tool for internal work and do not need agency billing, cobranding, or a Client Vault.
Questions
Is Felagar a Basecamp alternative for agencies?
For agencies that sell client work, yes. Basecamp is built as a calm project HQ. Felagar is built as the studio-to-client OS around that work.
Wij draaien het platform. Jij de studio.
Maak een account, nodig team en klanten uit, en je bent live, geen DevOps-sidequest. Updates, uptime en het portaal blijven bij ons zodat jij bij het werk blijft dat loont.