Vergleich
Felagarversus monday.com
monday.com sells flexible boards. Felagar sells an agency and client split that stays on-brand.
At a glance
If your monday.com board is the client experience, you are exposing studio guts. A portal is a different surface.
| Capability | Felagar | monday.com |
|---|---|---|
| Client portal | Branded portal, cobranding, guest review links | Client / guest views on boards. |
| AI | Rad, grounded in Client Vault and pulse (confirm before you send) | monday AI, not Vault-grounded. |
| Pricing model | Hosted plans plus a one-time self-host license | Seat-based SaaS. |
| Self-host | Yes, open-core with a license for full white-label | No. |
| White-label | Portal, auth, emails, custom domains on hosted SaaS | Work OS branding, not full agency cobranding. |
When Felagar fits better
Choose Felagar when you want a dedicated client portal, guest reviews, and agency CRM in one product.
When they may fit
Choose monday.com if the board itself is how every department, not just client delivery, already works.
Questions
Is Felagar less flexible than monday.com?
On purpose. Felagar is opinionated about agencies. monday.com is a kit. Kits need someone to invent the agency OS.
Wir betreiben die Plattform. Du das Studio.
Account anlegen, Team und Kunden einladen, und du bist live. Kein DevOps-Nebenkriegsschauplatz. Updates, Uptime und Portal bleiben bei uns, damit du bei der Arbeit bleibst, die zählt.