Vergleich
Felagarversus Asana
Asana tracks work. Felagar tracks client work, including the people who pay for it.
At a glance
Asana guests are not a studio. If you are stitching CRM and a portal around Asana, you are building Felagar by hand.
| Capability | Felagar | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Client portal | Branded portal, cobranding, guest review links | Guest access, not cobranded agency portals. |
| AI | Rad, grounded in Client Vault and pulse (confirm before you send) | Asana AI, not Client Vault. |
| Pricing model | Hosted plans plus a one-time self-host license | Seat-based SaaS. |
| Self-host | Yes, open-core with a license for full white-label | No. |
| White-label | Portal, auth, emails, custom domains on hosted SaaS | Not an agency white-label product. |
When Felagar fits better
Choose Felagar when the client relationship is the product, not a guest seat on a task.
When they may fit
Choose Asana if PM across many internal teams is the job and clients barely enter the tool.
Questions
Can Felagar replace Asana?
For agency delivery, CRM, and portal, that is the intent. If you use Asana as company-wide OKR and PM, keep Asana for that slice.
Wir betreiben die Plattform. Du das Studio.
Account anlegen, Team und Kunden einladen, und du bist live. Kein DevOps-Nebenkriegsschauplatz. Updates, Uptime und Portal bleiben bei uns, damit du bei der Arbeit bleibst, die zählt.