Vergleich
Felagarversus Accelo
Accelo automates professional services. Felagar is built around how agencies ship with clients.
At a glance
If Accelo feels heavy for a design-led shop, the alternative is not another PSA. It is an OS that still looks like a studio.
| Capability | Felagar | Accelo |
|---|---|---|
| Client portal | Branded portal, cobranding, guest review links | Client portals in the PSA sense. |
| AI | Rad, grounded in Client Vault and pulse (confirm before you send) | Not Rad / Client Vault. |
| Pricing model | Hosted plans plus a one-time self-host license | PSA packaging. Check their site. |
| Self-host | Yes, open-core with a license for full white-label | SaaS-first. |
| White-label | Portal, auth, emails, custom domains on hosted SaaS | PSA-style branding; confirm depth. |
When Felagar fits better
Choose Felagar for studios that sell craft and need a branded client loop, not a PSA implementation project.
When they may fit
Choose Accelo if you want aggressive service automation and can staff the implementation.
Questions
Is Felagar simpler than Accelo?
For most creative and web shops, yes. Accelo is broader PSA. Felagar is opinionated around agency delivery and clients.
Wir betreiben die Plattform. Du das Studio.
Account anlegen, Team und Kunden einladen, und du bist live. Kein DevOps-Nebenkriegsschauplatz. Updates, Uptime und Portal bleiben bei uns, damit du bei der Arbeit bleibst, die zählt.